According to the United States Department of Transportation, nearly 30 people throughout the nation die in drunk driving crashes daily. Alcohol impairs a driver’s ability to react to unexpected events and often leads to erratic, unsafe driving. At Gelb & Gelb, P.C., we help people hurt by the negligent or reckless conduct of others, including drunk drivers. Throughout D.C., our team helps accident victims and their families seek compensation for losses from vehicle collisions and other incidents. Car crashes caused by drunk driving can lead to serious physical and emotional harm. Our drunk driving accident lawyers in Washington, DC, have decades of experience personally handling thousands of injury claims.
We pride ourselves on personal attention, as Attorney Gelb personally communicates with his clients as he investigates, negotiates, and, if necessary, litigates on their behalf. We have a history of obtaining verdicts and settlements in the millions of dollars. Further, we have a strong reputation as a leading injury firm in the region. If you need assistance from a Washington, D.C., car accident attorney in assessing whether you have a negligence or wrongful death claim following a crash, contact us to schedule a free consultation.
For all legal claims following a drunk driving accident, the victim must demonstrate fault. Liability, or legal fault, for causing injuries or death in a drunk driving accident may extend beyond the drunk driver. In some circumstances, you may pursue a claim against a bar or restaurant owner who provided the customer with alcohol. Laws differ in D.C., Maryland, and Virginia on a business’s liability for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person. Further, if the drunk driver was employed at the time of the collision, their employer may be at fault.
If the case goes to court or litigation begins, courts often favor a plaintiff hit by a drunk driver. Whether the defendant’s intoxication is admissible depends on the circumstances. The defense attorney would likely stipulate the liability in the accident. That means that the trial would only be about the claim’s value. That would be the only dispute in the case with a drunk driver, typically. Otherwise, if it is litigated and the fact that the defendant driver was drunk when the accident occurred, that may increase the value of the claim.
If the injured claimant’s drunkenness was not a contributing factor to the accident, they may not be held liable for damages. However, they may still be able to pursue a claim against a negligent driver who caused the accident. It is best to speak to an experienced drunk-driving car accident lawyer in DC to learn about the role of liability and negligence in a case.
In most personal injury claims following a car accident, the injured plaintiff demonstrates the at-fault driver’s negligence to recover compensation for accident-related costs such as injuries, property damage, and medical bills. Proving negligence requires setting forth evidence that the defendant’s conduct failed to meet the standard of care appropriate for the specific situation and that these actions directly caused harm. In many cases, that can mean proving that reckless conduct, such as distracted or aggressive driving, caused your accident and injuries. However, like many other states, following an accident caused by a drunk driver in Washington, D.C., the legal concept of negligence per se may apply, helping the plaintiff to secure damages. If the driver hits you and runs, there are steps we can take in that situation, too.
Negligence per se applies when a defendant violates a law that sets the standard of conduct and harms those it protects. Washington, D.C. law prohibits drunk or intoxicated driving.
Washington, D.C. law lists three drunk driving offenses to reduce accidents and protect others: Driving While Intoxicated, Driving Under the Influence, and Operating While Impaired. Drunk driving laws in all three states exist to protect others from the dangers of intoxicated drivers.
After a drunk driving accident, an injured plaintiff may assert negligence per se in a civil case. This claim proceeds separately from any criminal charges against the defendant. If a driver causes an accident and faces arrest or charges for drunk driving, the law presumes negligence.
A conviction for drunk driving may be admissible as evidence in a personal injury claim. A successful assertion of negligence per se includes showing that the plaintiff is a member of the group the law intends to protect. It must also show that the harm aligns with what the law aims to prevent. The jury or judge would not have to determine whether the at-fault driver acted reasonably. However, proving a proximate cause remains essential. This means an intervening cause cannot cause the crash and resulting injuries. An experienced auto collision lawyer can help you make a claim for compensation.
As the final step in a personal injury claim following a drunk driving vehicle collision, the victim plaintiff will set forth the costs associated with the accident. The type of compensation that may be available to victims of a drunk driving collision includes economic and non-economic damages. In most cases, the victim will present the costs associated with the accident, including hospital and medical bills, lost wages, and damage to their vehicle. Because many drunk driving victims suffer debilitating, life-altering harm, it is common to include non-economic damages as well. These refer to a decreased quality of life, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium. In addition to other damages, punitive damages may be available to drunk driving accident victims. These damages are to punish and deter conduct that the court deems reprehensible.
In the event of a tragic death following a drunk driving collision, loved ones and other legally specified individuals may pursue a wrongful death case on behalf of the deceased. Our Washington DC drunk driving accident lawyers have settled over 10,000 wrongful death claims and make it a priority to help the families of fatal accident victims seek justice.
This is a civil liability statute that renders a Dram shop liable for the harmful acts of its intoxicated customers when the Dram Shop acts negligently in serving alcohol to the customer and the customer then causes harm to a third party because of the intoxication. Some states or jurisdictions do extend this rule to private residences. Washington, D.C., is not one of those jurisdictions. The watershed case that established the rule in Washington, D.C., is Rong Yao Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc. This case holds that violation of a statute imposing criminal sanctions on a dram shop for serving intoxicated customers creates a duty to the general public.
In negligence law, which is the cause of action against a dram shop, a legal duty must be established before proving that there is a breach of duty. Of course, not every defendant owes a duty to every conceivable plaintiff. Moreover, we must prove the duty owed to each foreseeable plaintiff by a preponderance of the evidence. Rong Yao Zhou establishes the most critical component of a dram shop case.
A dram shop is a commercial establishment that sells alcoholic beverages. This distinction is important because it means a private residence is not a dram shop. Examples of dram shops include bars, nightclubs, taverns, and restaurants.
At Gelb & Gelb, P.C., we understand the dire impact a vehicle crash can have upon the victim and their family. Drunk drivers should be accountable for careless and reckless conduct that causes injuries. At our firm, our client’s emotional, physical, and financial needs drive our diligent legal representation. Our Washington, DC, drunk driving accident lawyers proudly serve clients throughout the District of Columbia. To learn more about your potential legal claim, please contact us at 202-331-7227 or complete our online form.
Gelb & Gelb, P.C.
N/a
Copyright © 2025 Gelb & Gelb, P.C. All rights reserved.